Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1155520120070040293
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
2012 Volume.7 No. 4 p.293 ~ p.300
Effect-site target-controlled infusion of propofol: comparison of Schnider and modified Marsh models
Chang Ri-Na

Baik Hee-Jung
Kim Dong-Yeon
Lee Guie-Yong
Chung Rack-Kyung
Lee Hee-Seung
Abstract
Background:We investigated effect-site concentrations of propofol, changes in blood pressure and heart rate, time to loss of consciousness, time to loss of eyelid reflex and awakening time during anesthesia using effect-site target-controlled infusion, to compare the differences between Schnider and modified Marsh model. Methods:Forty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II patients between the ages of 18 and 55 years old and who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomized into two groups: one group using modified Marsh model (Group 1) and the other group using Schnider model (Group 2). Effect-site concentrations of propofol, blood pressure, heart rate and BIS at each anesthetic stage were recorded. Time to loss of consciousness, time to loss of eyelid reflex and awakening time were measured. Results:Group 1 showed shorter time to loss of consciousness and eyelid reflex at the lower effect-site concentration of propofol than Group 2 (P £¼ 0.05). The effect-site concentrations of Group 1 were higher than those of Group 2 at eye opening and extubation (P £¼ 0.05). Conclusions:Induction of anesthesia is achieved at lower effect- site concentration of propofol and more rapidly in the modified Marsh model than in the Schnider model. However the effect-site concentrations of propofol for awakening are higher in the modified Marsh model than in the Schnider model. (Anesth Pain Med 2012; 7: 293¡­300)
KEYWORD
Modified Marsh model, Propofol, Schnider model, Target controlled infusion
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø